Current:Home > StocksSupreme Court agrees to hear dispute over effort to trademark "Trump Too Small"-InfoLens
Supreme Court agrees to hear dispute over effort to trademark "Trump Too Small"
View Date:2024-12-23 21:44:55
Washington — The Supreme Court said Monday that it will hear a dispute arising from an unsuccessful effort to trademark the phrase "Trump Too Small" to use on t-shirts and hats, a nod to a memorable exchange between then-presidential candidates Marco Rubio and Donald Trump during a 2016 Republican presidential primary debate.
At issue in the case, known as Vidal v. Elster, is whether the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office violated the First Amendment when it refused to register the mark "Trump Too Small" under a provision of federal trademark law that prohibits registration of any trademark that includes a name of a living person unless they've given written consent. The justices will hear arguments in its next term, which begins in October, with a decision expected by June 2024.
The dispute dates back to 2018, when Steve Elster, a California lawyer and progressive activist, sought federal registration of the trademark "Trump Too Small," which he wanted to put on shirts and hats. The phrase invokes a back-and-forth between Trump and Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, who were at the time seeking the 2016 GOP presidential nomination, during a televised debate. Rubio had made fun of Trump for allegedly having small hands, insinuating that Trump has a small penis.
Elster explained to the Patent and Trademark Office that the mark is "political commentary" targeting Trump and was meant to convey that "some features of President Trump and his policies are diminutive," according to his application. The mark, Elster argued, "is commentary about the substance of Trump's approach to governing as president."
Included as part of his request is an image of a proposed t-shirt featuring the phrase "TRUMP TOO SMALL" on the front, and "TRUMP'S PACKAGE IS TOO SMALL" on the back, under which is a list of policy areas on which he is "small."
An examiner refused to register the mark, first because it included Trump's name without his written consent and then because the mark may falsely suggest a connection with the president.
Elster appealed to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, arguing the two sections of a law known as the Lanham Act applied by the examiner impermissibly restricted his speech. But the board agreed the mark should be denied, resting its decision on the provision of trademark law barring registration of a trademark that consists of a name of a living person without their consent.
But the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed, finding that applying the provision of federal trademark law to prohibit registration of Elster's mark unconstitutionally restricts free speech.
"There can be no plausible claim that President Trump enjoys a right of privacy protecting him from criticism," the unanimous three-judge panel wrote in a February 2022 decision.
While the government has an interest in protecting publicity rights, the appellate court said, the "right of publicity does not support a government restriction on the use of a mark because the mark is critical of a public official without his or her consent."
The Biden administration appealed the decision to the Supreme Court, arguing that for more than 75 years, the Patent and Trademark Office has been directed to refuse registration of trademarks that use the name of a living person without his or her written consent.
"Far from enhancing freedom of speech, the decision below makes it easier for individuals like respondent to invoke enforcement mechanisms to restrict the speech of others," Biden administration lawyers wrote.
But Elster's attorneys argued the lower court's decision is narrow and "bound to the specific circumstances of this case."
"Unlike other cases in which the Court has reviewed decisions declaring federal statutes unconstitutional, this case involves a one-off as-applied constitutional challenge — one that turns on the unique circumstances of the government's refusal to register a trademark that voices political criticism of a former President of the United States," they told the court.
veryGood! (786)
Related
- Katharine Hayhoe’s Post-Election Advice: Fight Fear, Embrace Hope and Work Together
- Japanese moon lander touches down, but crippled by mission-ending power glitch
- If you donate DNA, what should scientists give in return? A 'pathbreaking' new model
- Taylor Swift, Jason Kelce and Kylie Kelce Unite to Cheer on Travis Kelce at Chiefs Playoffs Game
- Father, 5 children hurt in propane tank explosion while getting toys: 'Devastating accident'
- Surprise ‘SNL’ guest Rachel McAdams asks Jacob Elordi for acting advice: ‘Give up’
- Trump may testify in sex abuse defamation trial, but the court has limited what he can say
- 23 lost skiers and snowboarders rescued in frigid temperatures in Killington, Vermont
- Brush fire erupts in Brooklyn's iconic Prospect Park amid prolonged drought
- UN migration agency seeks $7.9 billion to help people on the move and the communities that host them
Ranking
- Police cruiser strikes and kills a bicyclist pulling a trailer in Vermont
- Samsung launches S24 phone line with AI, social media features at 'Galaxy Unpacked' event
- Rachel McAdams Supports Mean Girls' Reneé Rapp on SNL With Surprise Appearance
- German train drivers’ union calls a six-day strike starting Wednesday over pay, working hours
- Mississippi governor intent on income tax cut even if states receive less federal money
- Iran is ‘directly involved’ in Yemen Houthi rebel ship attacks, US Navy’s Mideast chief tells AP
- Japanese moon lander touches down, but crippled by mission-ending power glitch
- Jamaica cracks down on domestic violence with new laws aimed at better protecting victims
Recommendation
-
The Fate of Hoda Kotb and Jenna Bush Hager's Today Fourth Hour Revealed
-
Adrián Beltré is a Hall of Fame lock. How close to unanimous will it be?
-
US government rejects complaint that woman was improperly denied an emergency abortion in Oklahoma
-
Trump may testify in sex abuse defamation trial, but the court has limited what he can say
-
Princess Kate to host annual Christmas carol service following cancer treatment
-
11-month-old baby boy burned to death from steam of radiator in Brooklyn apartment: NYPD
-
Lions host Bucs in divisional round, aiming to win 2 playoff games in season for 1st time since 1957
-
Travis Kelce Proves He's the King of Taylor Swift's Heart During Chiefs Playoffs Game